The Pre-Access Billing Predicate
For more than 800 days, Case 23-009185 rested on two generic violation codes while the City billed $31,230 in monitoring fees, administrative penalties, and order/title charges. The two codes were B31 ("Other - BUILDING - Other") and B59 ("Permits Required," SCC.8.100.190); from the 03/20/2023 violation opening through the last billing cycle before access, the City's Violations Index M012 contains no property-specific defect description. The B31 entry states on its face: "This is not a complete Violation List ... Neither interior nor exterior has been completely inspected" M012. The charges — 23 HDB Monitoring Fee cycles, 22 administrative-penalty cycles, and the initial order/title invoice — are itemized in the activity-log invoice sequence M025-035 and ledgered in Card 11. The produced record shows no completed interior or full-yard inspection during that period.
The monitoring-fee provision ties the charge to each additional inspection of the property after the Notice and Order becomes final SCC.8.100.720(B)(1)(b). The produced file shows a 03/20/2023 front/alley visit, later front-door postings, and a limited neighbor-yard observation of a garage addition M024. It does not show an interior or full-yard condition inspection, or a per-cycle monitoring worksheet, during the billed period.
IN PLAIN TERMS
Over 26 months the City billed the owner $31,230 — order and title charges, 23 monitoring-fee cycles, and 22 penalty cycles — before its file shows a complete inspection of the property's interior or yard. The charges ran against two generic codes that did not change during that period. One of the two said, in the City's own records, that the violation list was incomplete and that the building had not been fully inspected. City rules tie the monitoring fee to inspections of the property. The file contains no record of such inspections, or of monitoring worksheets, for the billed cycles.
RECORD CHAIN
- Through the pre-access period, the case rested on two placeholder codes. The Violations Index M012 carried B31 and B59, both opened 03/20/2023. The B31 entry states that the list is incomplete and that neither interior nor exterior has been completely inspected; B59 cites SCC.8.100.190 without identifying which work or condition required a permit.
The two index entries read: "B31: Other - BUILDING - Other | Open | Open Date: 03/20/2023 | This is not a complete Violation List of building code violations. Neither interior nor exterior has been completely inspected." "B59: 8.100.190 - BUILDING - Permits Required | Open | Open Date: 03/20/2023 | Work has been done without the benefit of a PERMIT."
- The only pre-order activity that verified the garage addition is a neighbor-yard observation. The reinspection note M024 records "I took pictures of what I saw from where I was standing" from the neighbors' backyard. It verifies an addition to the detached garage in general terms, but it is not an interior or completed condition inspection and supplies no itemized violation findings.
- The City billed against those two entries for 26 months. The 23 HDB Monitoring Fee cycles and 22 administrative-penalty cycles ran from the first monitoring fee to the last cycle before access M002 M009, with the 23 monitoring invoices itemized from CDDCHC17598 through CDDCHC22795 in the activity-log pages
M025-035and carried in the master ledger Card 11 Card 15. - The code ties the fee to an inspection event the produced record does not show.
SCC.8.100.720(B)(1)(b)defines the charge by reference to each additional inspection of the property after the Notice and Order becomes final. The produced record shows no interior or condition inspection of the property during the billed period and no per-cycle monitoring worksheet. - The first documented access and the itemized codes post-date the billed period. The first documented past-the-gate backyard/interior inspection is 08/21/2025 M035; the case log labels that entry "Backyard inspection" M009. The later itemized codes (B23, B45, E02, E03, E06, E08, E11, P05, P08, and P09) were not opened until 08/29/2025
M012-013. Both dates fall after the close of the $31,230 pre-access ledger.
FULL CIRCLE
The pre-access record reduces to three points. The Violations Index carried the two placeholder codes, one stating that the list is incomplete M012. The produced record shows no interior or yard inspection of the property's condition, no per-cycle monitoring worksheet, and no non-placeholder violation entry before 08/29/2025 M012. The invoice trail ran 23 monitoring cycles, 22 penalty cycles, and the initial order/title charges to $31,230 M025-035 Card 11 before the first documented past-the-gate backyard/interior inspection M035.
The City may respond that these were initial citations meant to be updated once the owner allowed a full interior inspection; that the owner's non-cooperation delayed factual specification; and that monitoring fees are authorized regardless of whether a physical inspection occurs each cycle. The record bears on each point. The two entries remained unchanged for more than 800 days while the penalty and monitoring cycles ran M012, and the first documented access came on 08/21/2025 M035. The only pre-order activity that verified the garage addition is the neighbor-yard observation — "what I saw from where I was standing" M024 — not an interior or completed condition inspection. On the third point, SCC.8.100.720(B)(1)(b) ties the charge to each additional inspection of the property after the order becomes final; the produced record shows no such inspection for the 23 billed cycles, and the entries the cycles ran against are the ones the B31 text describes as incomplete M012.
In the produced record, the pre-access charges were billed against a violation list the case file itself described as incomplete and not completely inspected M012, and the file does not show the per-cycle inspections to which the fee provision ties the charge SCC.8.100.720(B)(1)(b).
APPLICABLE LAW
- SCC.8.100.190: Sacramento City Code general permit-requirement statute; the statutory basis cited by violation code B59 ("Permits Required"). The provision does not name which specific work or condition required a permit - the code is generic Title-15 language, not property-specific
- SCC.8.100.720: Sacramento City Code HDB Monitoring Fee statute. Subsection (B)(1)(b) ties the charge to each additional inspection of the property after the Notice and Order becomes final. The produced record does not show such an inspection occurring during the billed period
SOURCE CITATIONS USED BY THIS CARD
- M002: p.2 - 05/19/2023 case log entry "Send 1st admin penalty / Monitoring fee"; 1st HSG HDB Monitoring fee requested 05/22/2023 - opening of the billed cycle.
- M009: p.9 - 07/24/2025 case log: HDB Monitoring Fee and Admin Penalty posting (22nd HSG Admin Penalty cycle, last cycle before access); 08/21/2025 RE-INSPECTION entry labeled "Backyard inspection at 1:00pm."
- M012: p.12 - Violations Index showing B31 + B59 opened 03/20/2023 with the "not a complete Violation List of building code violations. Neither interior nor exterior has been completely inspected" disclaimer; later itemized codes opened 08/29/2025 - after the pre-access billing period closes.
- M013: p.13 - Violations Index continuation / case-file page carrying the continuation of later itemized entries opened 08/29/2025.
- M024: p.24 - 03/20/2023 front/alley visit and 04/11/2023 RE-INSPECTION activity note: "I took pictures of what I saw from where I was standing" (neighbor's backyard vantage) and general verification of an addition to the detached garage. No interior/yard access and no itemized violation findings.
M025-035: pp.25-35 - activity-log invoice sequence itemizing the 23 pre-access HDB Monitoring invoices from CDDCHC17598 ($305 for HDB Monitoring 05/22/2023) through CDDCHC22795 ($380 for HDB Monitoring 07/24/2025), plus the paired administrative-penalty cycle records through the 22nd $1,000 directive.- M035: p.35 - 08/21/2025 case note: "I arrived onsite on 8/21/25 with PBI Cosley at 11:30am" - first documented past-the-gate backyard/interior inspection.
- R.25-3549: NextRequest 25-3549 - November 2025 closed-as-complete production; one of three productions showing the violations list unchanged
- R.26-1549: NextRequest 26-1549 - April 2026 closed-as-complete production; one of three productions showing the violations list unchanged
- R.26-1965: NextRequest 26-1965 - May 2026 production; provenance source for the M-series case-file pages cited by this card
Note on fee arithmetic: The per-cycle invoice itemization lives in Card 11 (master fee ledger). The billing window's bookends — the first monitoring fee (M002) and the 22nd/last admin-penalty cycle closing 07/24/2025 (M009) — are confirmed in the May PDF case notes; the itemized $31,230 total is established in the Card 11 ledger independent of any CSV export. The renamed MAY_*.csv files are stale byte-copies of the April production export and are not relied upon here.
CARD REFERENCES
- Card 15 - supervisor-branded penalty orders issued against the same two-code incomplete predicate.
- Card 11 - master fee ledger: $31,230 itemized invoice-by-invoice across the initial order/title invoice, all 23 monitoring cycles, and all 22 pre-access penalty cycles.
- Card 4 - production-completeness baseline: the closed-as-complete record carries the absences; disproving this card requires records the City's own closed production does not contain.